THE ZONES. THE ACTIVITY. THE PIPELINE.
Put the proposed map against the money.
Where declared construction value sits—and what is moving through the development pipeline.
Declared construction value
citywide · Sep 2025–Aug 2026Permit valuations. Not verified capital invested.
CA-recommended OZ 2.0 tracts
Santa Clara CountySeptember 21 recommendation snapshot. Not final designation.
Recorded major-project pipeline
projects in the city footprint extractHistorical source stages. Not a live construction census.
OZ 2.0 recommendations
ZIP value window · SEP 2025—AUG 2026
ZIP value window · SEP 2025—AUG 2026
Owned vector basemap · Census tract / ZCTA boundaries · city project footprints
↑
N
N
Green bands: under $10M / $10–25M / $25–50M / $50–100M / $100M+ per ZIP. Purple = recommendation, not certified designation. Project-type filters affect pipeline marks and lists only—not permit dollars.
Every tract has a research story.
The geography is mapped. The case for development is the next question.
PROVENANCE OVER PRECISION THE DATA DOES NOT HAVE
What the map knows. What it does not.
THE CURRENT BUILD STOPS AT MAP SYNTHESIS
First connect the maps.
This screen combines the California recommendation geography, corrected ZIP-level declared permit values and the city’s recorded major-project pipeline. It does not make a tract-selection recommendation.
Next data question—not a completed feature
Geocode and verify individual permit/site locations before attributing permit valuations to tracts. Independently establish eligible alternatives and obtain Urban Catalyst’s exact proposed substitutions.
Parcel → pro forma → further workflow
Explicitly deferred by Q. No parcel economics, underwriting assumptions, financial model, or investment recommendation has been generated here.